Proposal of a "comite de suivi" (version 25/09/24):
===================================================

To propose a comite de suivi, the directeur de these fills out the following form and emails it to Benjamin Doerr with PhD student and all other supervisors in cc. Incomplete or false declarations constitute a scientific misconduct. If you receive, as PhD student or co-supervisor, this form in cc of an email to Benjamin Doerr, verify that it accurately describes what you have discussed, and correct if necessary. 

Committee member 1: 
- NAME, first name:
- HDR: YES/NO
- expert in the field: YES/NO
- external to IP Paris
- affiliation:
- link to homepage:
- link to Google scholar profile:

Committee member proposed by the PhD student: 
- NAME, first name:
- HDR: YES/NO
- expert in the field: YES/NO
- external to IP Paris
- affiliation:
- link to homepage:
- link to Google scholar profile:

YES/NO: We, directeur de these and PhD student, declare that none of the two proposed members (i) has or has had any significant collaboration (joint publications, joint scientific projects or fundings) with one of us, (ii) is or was in a close personal relation with one of us, or (iii) has any other increased risk of being or appearing to be in a conflict-of-interest situation as member of the comite de suivi. We also declare that both are not in our team(s) and not part of this PhD project. They are both experienced and competent researchers or teacher-researchers in the area of the thesis (not necessarily experts right on the thesis topic). 

If the above was not answered with a clear and enthusiastic YES, we describe now in detail what hindered us from answering YES (all that applies!), why we are convinced that there is no problem, and why we did not propose a different comite de suivi for which we could have easily answered YES: