-
Fri, 9 Oct 2009
-
Thu, 1 Jan 2009
-
Fri, 6 Feb 2009
On using sums-of-squares for exact computations without strict feasibility
Fri, 2010-01-08 15:06 | by assia
In order to prove that a system of real polynomial inequalities has no
solution, the usual method is to compute a cylindrical algebraic
decomposition (CAD) of that system, which yields a false/true answer -
for instance, using Mathematica's Reduce function. CAD implementations,
especially those that implement optimizations necessary to go beyond toy
examples, are notoriously complex and trusting such a massive amount of
code for applications such as proving mathematical theorems or proving
safety-critical programs is methodologically disputable.
Instead of trusting a complex implementation, or building a certified
version thereof, we would prefer the complex algorithm produces an
easily checkable "witness" of its answer. For systems of polynomials
inequalities, the Positivstellensatz theorems ensure the existence of
witnesses made of sums of squares of polynomials. As a particular case,
a nonnegative polynomial can often be expressed as a sum of squares of
polynomials, and can always be expressed as a quotient of sums of
squares of polynomials.
Such sums of squares are solutions of a semidefinite programming
feasibility problem (that is, given F_0, ..., F_n symmetric matrices,
finding y_i such that -F_0 + \sum_i y_i F_i is semidefinite positive,
that is, has no negative eigenvalues). Unfortunately, direct application
of semidefinite programming numerical methods is only possible if the
solution set has nonempty interior. This is not the case in general.
We propose a workaround for this problem, based on LLL lattice reduction.
Date:
Thursday, February 25, 2010 - 14:00 - 16:00
Speaker:
David Monniaux (CNRS, Verimag)